Title: “The Girl Before”
Author: JP Delaney
Genre: Psychological thriller
Publication Date: Jan. 24, 2017 (Ballantine Books)
My Rating: ★★★★☆
“Make a list of every possession you consider essential to your life.”
The request comes from Edward Monkford, the tech-minimalist, narcissistic control-freak of an architect who owns the showpiece home that is One Folgate Street. It’s a unique house with a particular landlord who likes his rules. No books in the house; no curtains or rugs. Certainly no dishes left on the counter. No pets, no kids. The home consists mostly of slabs of pale stone, expensive glass and a stairway with no railing. An app controls everything from entry to lighting and shower pressure, and Internet searches filter though “Housekeeper.” There’s a monthly assessment, and if you don’t take it in a timely enough fashion, the system shuts down — keeping the occupant from, say, using the hot water or getting a shower. It’s a sleek, futuristic home designed to transform its occupants.
Emma, reeling from a traumatic break-in, thinks it’s worth it. A couple years later — following Emma’s unexplained death in the home — Jane, recovering from a stillborn, does, too.
But will the fate of the girl before become hers, too?
Narration alternates each chapter — we bounce from Emma, then, to Jane, now, until Emma’s story ceases. Both, of course, become entangled with Monkford (but the relationships will be short, each woman is told — lasting only as long as they remain truly perfect.)
At this point, most of us are wary of “girl” books (Gone Girl, Girl on the Train….) But “The Girl Before” offers a unique premise, and it’s a fast-paced, twisty read. The chapters get shorter as the book reaches the climax and excitement builds. I didn’t *love* it the way I love some books, but I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it, and I’m excited for the movie, which is being produced by Ron Howard.
Trivia: The book is written by JP Delaney, a pen name for the British author Tony Strong. “There are some big advantages to using a pseudonym,” he told The New York Times. “The first is that people can’t tell from the initials if I’m a man or a woman — and I’ve been really gratified that many readers have assumed from the way I’ve written from two female perspectives that I’m actually a woman. The second is that you know people are responding to something in the story, not to a name. . . . To write under a completely new name is to free yourself from expectations.”